You are currently browsing the daily archive for June 26th, 2006.

Life is sacred.

Well, many people will say they have such a view. But if forced to elaborate on their opinion, what they really mean to say is that human life is sacred. For some people, this is religious in nature (humans have a “soul/spirit” while other creatures do not). However, there are still many people who maintain a religious viewpoint is not crucial to the particular sanctity of human life. In this case, if forced to chose between a human life and a dolphin life (for example), the human life would always be chosen because the human life has more value (whether by virtue of intelligence, civilization, societal structure, or a number of other factors). What about two dolphins versus one human life? Three dolphins? Even if there is a religious justification for the inherent value in human life, there must be some number of dolphins N such that the value in preserving N dolphins is worth the loss of a single human life.

And of course the question doesn’t end there. How many earthworms have an equivalent value to a single human life? How many acres of rainforest? How large a bacterial colony? Of course I have no way of quantifying this value in life, but the automatic assumption of (nearly) infinite value in human life does not seem reasonable to me.

Planetary Messenger

My philosophical novel Planetary Messenger is now available at Amazon.com!

Planetary Messenger

Click to buy on Amazon

If you like this blog, then be sure to pick up a copy of Planetary Messenger.

Archives